[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Interesting automake feature

To: linuxgames@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: Interesting automake feature
From: Al Riddoch <ajr@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:44:18 +0000
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: mailing list linuxgames@sunsite.dk
Delivery-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 06:44:30 -0500
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211251011070.25038-100000@challenge.dk>
Mailing-List: contact linuxgames-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10211251104550.9398-100000@infa.abo.fi> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211251011070.25038-100000@challenge.dk>
Reply-To: linuxgames@sunsite.dk
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:12:00AM +0100, Mads Bondo Dydensborg wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Jan Ekholm wrote:
> 
> > So, is the bottom line that automake is for C projects, not C++ ones?
> 
> Well, I write c++ and I name my header files foo.hh - your question would 
> seem to imply that header files should be named foo - I don't agree.
> 

I don't think I've ever seen header files other than the standard library
headers without a suffix, and probably neither have the autotools
developers. It is very probably the source of your woes.

Al

PGP signature

References:
- Re: Interesting automake feature
  - From: Jan Ekholm <chakie@infa.abo.fi>
- Re: Interesting automake feature
  - From: Mads Bondo Dydensborg <madsdyd@challenge.dk>

Prev by Date: Re: Interesting automake bug(?)
Next by Date: Re: Interesting automake feature
Prev by thread: Re: Interesting automake bug
Next by thread: Re: Interesting automake feature
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread