[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The future of C/C++
On Wednesday 17 January 2001 16:36, Achilles wrote:
> He then went on talking about new projects using primarily Java,
> stating that the language was still very slow, regarding performance,
> but that it would soon change, suggesting that C/C++ were near an
> "end". I'd like to know your opinion about this: what do you think? Is
C++ surely won't go away anytime soon, and Java is way overhyped.
It has 3 main "advantages":
(1) It comes standard with a bytecode interpreter
(2) It comes with a hugs standard library
(3) It has automatic garbage collection
Aside from that it's more or less a clone of C++ with the advanced
features removed:
* no operator overloading
* no teplates or seomthing similar. that means you can either have
generic code or typesafe code, but not both
...
And even the advantages are not that great - bytecode interpreters can be
written for (almost) any language, garbage collection as well and the
standard library is actually bloated and overly complex (and is the only
buggy standard library I encountered up to now).
I mean, Java is kinda nice, and it's good for some things. But I don't
think it really has the potential to *replace* C++
--
Christian Reiniger
LGDC Webmaster (http://sunsite.dk/lgdc/)
...to paraphrase Churchill, while representative democracy may be
terrible, it's still the best system that large corporations can buy.
- David Weinberger JOHO January 25, 2000
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: linuxgames-unsubscribe@sunsite.dk
For additional commands, e-mail: linuxgames-help@sunsite.dk