[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SEUL: Re: package format

To: Loren S Osborn <lso8219@cs.rit.edu>
Subject: Re: SEUL: Re: package format
From: William T Wilson <fluffy@dunadan.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 01:05:04 -0500 (EST)
cc: seul-project@seul.org, kde-distribution@thunder.dorm.duke.edu, bruce@pixar.com, omega@seul.org
In-Reply-To: <199801082132.QAA02942@buddy.rit.edu>
Sender: owner-seul-project@seul.org
To-Get-Off-This-List: mail majordomo@seul.org, body unsubscribe seul-project

On Thu, 8 Jan 1998, Loren S Osborn wrote:

> Whoa! Who said anything about Qt... The idea is all the common tools that
> need to be developed between e-linux and SUEL, (and maybe LinNet) will be 
> done with a command line or prompt interface (a partition magic clone is

I think this is specifically not what we're going to do.  I thought the
rule is no command lines unless the user really wants a command line.  The
tools maybe will still run this way - but there has to be a front-end for
it.

> the probelm with Qt???  SEUL (as I recall anyway) already committed itself
> to stearing clear of licenses more restrictive than GPL... No?

Not that I know of.  Debian does this for what amount to religious
purposes, but Red Hat doesn't in all cases and I don't expect SEUL to
either. Not too long ago I was suggesting methods for SRPM's to
automatically download and install 'evil-license' software.

References:
- SEUL: Re: package format
  - From: lso8219@cs.rit.edu (Loren S Osborn)

Prev by Date: Re: SEUL: Common SEUL/e-linux tools needed
Next by Date: SEUL: Re: Volunteers
Prev by thread: SEUL: Re: package format
Next by thread: SEUL: Re: package format
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread