[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SEUL: package format

To: seul-project@seul.org, kde-distribution@thunder.dorm.duke.edu
Subject: Re: SEUL: package format
From: David McCanney <D.McCanney@udcf.gla.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 21:21:43 +0000 (GMT)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.PTX.3.95.980108114005.20418Z-100000@eng2.sequent.com>
Sender: owner-seul-project@seul.org
To-Get-Off-This-List: mail majordomo@seul.org, body unsubscribe seul-project

> > but Debian's obviously not going to put Qt in any of its tools, ever.
> > Sorry!
> I agree wholeheartedly.  I haven't read it in detail, but the restrictions
> the license impose are restricting enough to kill its acceptance in the
> free software community.  Even a version jump and replacement of the
> license for 1.x wouldn't work, because the free software world is then
> stuck on the trailing edge.
> 
> I'd bet on GNOME, gtk, and gtk+, personally.  (btw, what's the latest on
> Parc's ILU license?)
 
Why is this being CC'd to the kde-distribution list?  If you wish to
continue Qt bashing then remove us from the header.  We _really_ don't
need this.
--

Regards,
	
	--David

"The Truth may be out there, but the lies are inside your head"

References:
- Re: SEUL: package format
  - From: "Erik Walthinsen (Omega)" <omega@sequent.com>

Prev by Date: Re: SEUL: package format
Next by Date: SEUL: Re: package format
Prev by thread: Re: SEUL: package format
Next by thread: Re: SEUL: package format
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread