[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Some thoughts
This is the second attempt at this mail, the first having been cut short by a
segv of my MUA. This, you will see, prompted the last item.
First, there have been many articles about Linux. All the technical articles
have been good, but not all the 'community' articles have been. The problem
is that many people read something, even if it's only slightly incorrect (as
in Bill Machrone's "Second glance" article in PC Week), and flame the poor
guy. IMO, this is because no one in the Linux community recognizes a single
person or group responsible for press relations.
While I don't think we (SEUL) can do this by ourselves, we need to take an
active part in such efforts, possibly as catalyst (for now). There are
enough groups out there that, if banded together, would do exactly what we
need. They just don't know about each other, or haven't tried to cooperate.
OK, second. Recruiting: GLUE can point us to most of the LUG's around the
world. We should try to get these groups onboard, if for nothing else than
to make sure people know that we exist. Granted, it's too early to do this,
but we need to prepare for it.
Third, I have offered to help out a person who's getting started with Linux.
They want to get their machines set up with networking (with M$ systems), a
nice user environment, etc. What we should do is find a few people like
this, with people in SEUL helping them out (preferable a single person for
each 'newbie'), and document the entire process, finding out what's wrong in
a practical manner. Once these newbies cease to be newbies, they can help
the project themselves. This could be a valuable source of information.
Fourth, the web site. It needs some work. We need to decide what it needs,
then decide where to put it. I have enough stuff to do as it is, I'd like to
get someone else involved in at least planning it and writing content. The
whylinux? pages will help quite a bit, but there's a lot to do.
Finally, testing. We need to do testing of the software we use. The crash
of exmh I just had is enough to kill end-user acceptance. Windoze does it
all the time, I know, but people are used to that. We have to be
significantly better than doze on order to make the cut. We can't just be a
little better, or look cooler, we have to be materially better. That means
no leaks, segv's kernel panics, miscoded files, etc. While I know this is
impossible, we can come close. There are tools out there to help, like
Checker, ElectricFence, DDD(gdb), etc. Just producing and/or packaging the
stuff isn't enough. We have to make sure it's done right.
More will be spewing later, but I want to get this written down and
elsewhere, before my MUA crashes again.
TTYL,
Omega
Erik Walthinsen <omega@seul.org> - SEUL Project system architect
__
/ \ SEUL: Simple End-User Linux -
| | M E G A Creating a Linux distribution
_\ /_ for the home or office user
===
SEUL-Leaders list, seul-leaders-request@seul.org
===