[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SIF-Working-Groups: should we try?

To: seul-edu@seul.org
Subject: Re: SIF-Working-Groups: should we try?
From: Bruno Vernier <vernier@vc.bc.ca>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 11:49:50 -0800
In-Reply-To: "Doug Loss"
References: <19990316193937.C5929@vc.bc.ca> <36EFA49F.A3BD31C8@csrlink.net>
Reply-To: seul-edu@seul.org
Sender: owner-seul-edu@seul.org

On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 07:48:31AM -0500, Doug Loss wrote:

> It'd be nice to
> try to get a broader base of opinion on the SIF, I think.

I agree, Doug. If our relationship with SIF were to develop, it would be very 
nice if many of us checked out the SIF website and commented on it. If we 
reach some sort of consensus, that would be the closest thing we have to a 
"mandate" from the mailing list, right?

http://www.schoolsinterop.org

The website is maintained by microsoft and is not lynx friendly.  The specs 
are in word v7 (not v8 ??? yes that bothers me, because if it were in v8
I could do a better job of converting it into html) and I have posted the
text version on:

http://cran.seul.org/~vernier/eduml/cif.txt

thanks
Bruno

References:
- SIF-Working-Groups: should we try?
  - From: Bruno Vernier <vernier@seul.org>
- Re: SIF-Working-Groups: should we try?
  - From: Doug Loss <dloss@csrlink.net>

Prev by Date: [vernier: SIF]
Next by Date: Re: Putting it all together
Prev by thread: Re: SIF-Working-Groups: should we try?
Next by thread: [vernier: SIF]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread