[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: status LIBRARY software
- To: seul-edu@seul.org
- Subject: Re: status LIBRARY software
- From: Bruno Vernier <vernier@vc.bc.ca>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1999 13:59:58 -0800
- In-Reply-To: "Daniel P. Kionka"
- References: <19981229120000.A4721@vc.bc.ca> <368CD638.A3148863@blueneptune.com> <19990101130413.D27957@vc.bc.ca> <368DCE63.F9F81BC0@blueneptune.com>
- Reply-To: seul-edu@seul.org
- Sender: owner-seul-edu@seul.org
On Fri, Jan 01, 1999 at 11:44:35PM -0800, Daniel P. Kionka wrote:
> Someone wrote:
>
> > > Even though I have no idea what this project is about, I wanted to make
> > > one suggestion. The term "learner" sounds very awkward. I would
> > > recommend "student".
>
> To which I replied:
>
> > thanks for your input. Please note that you sent this suggestion just to me
> > and would you mind if I posted it on seul-edu. That way other people can
> > input on your suggestion. I chose "learner" (which is what we all are)
> > simply because it is more universal than "student" (which implies a
> > temporary passage in life) and the word is in common use among educators I
> > deal with. I don't mind changing it to "student"
>
> To which that same someone replied:
>
> I assume you are recording information about this person. We are all
> learners and teachers in life, but students have certain information
> recorded about them, and instructors have another kind of record.
> Learners do not get grades, they just learn.
>
> Maybe some educators use "learner", but at the college I teach and at my
> children's school they are students.
and I concluded:
OK. I am convinced. Unless there are any objections, the <learner> tag
will be changed to <student>
Bruno