[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[seul-edu] [Fwd: BOUNCE seul-edu@seul.org: Non-member submission from[David Bucknell <david@members.iteachnet.org>]]
- To: seul-edu@seul.org
- Subject: [seul-edu] [Fwd: BOUNCE seul-edu@seul.org: Non-member submission from[David Bucknell <david@members.iteachnet.org>]]
- From: Doug Loss <drloss@suscom.net>
- Date: 17 Feb 2003 09:32:21 -0500
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: seul-edu-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: seul-edu@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 09:42:35 -0500
- Reply-to: seul-edu@seul.org
- Sender: owner-seul-edu@seul.org
From: David Bucknell <david@members.iteachnet.org>
To: seul-edu@seul.org
Subject: Re: Phase I ISO Evals: intranet, courseware and some others
In-Reply-To: <200302160911.30197.meschman@etc-edu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.0
X-Originating-IP: 203.107.130.11
In case anyone besides Mike E. couldn't read my attachment, please see this link
for the intranet and courseware suggested categorization, picks for installation
and my (ahem) data:
http://opensourceschools.org/download/intraneteval.html
David
> . Since the intranet category is full of course builders and tools for
> courses, I . have felt it unavoidable while looking at intranets to look
> at
> apps that are . primarily in the courseware category. I suggest that we
> separate them in the . future. I know that when I submitted Manhattan, I
> was
> worried that it would be . overlooked when users were looking at
> intranets,
> so I included it in that . secondary category. Reading through the apps
> now,
> however, I find that this . cross-indexing is more confusing than helpful.
> So, I have, in the attached html . page, suggested recategorizing apps:
> .
> . *intranet-groupware (may contain couse builders, but may not -- perhaps
> more . valuable if they do)
> . *course builders (courses that would fit within an intranet/extranet.
> They
> may . have many features of an intranet, but are primarily course
> builders)
> . *courseware (tools that would fit inside a course)
> .
> . There are a couple of other categories in there, too.
> .
> . If I have not colored the row, it's because my findings are too
> inconclusive to . report anything at all.
> .
>
--
http://www.iteachnet.org
http://members.iteachnet.org/webzine *
http://opensourceschools.org *
http://www.rose-marie.ac.th *
------------------------------------------------
http://members.iteachnet.org/
http://www.opensourceschools.org/
--
If this helped you please take the time to rate the value
of this post; just click on the Affero link below.
http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=drloss
Doug Loss All you need in this life is
drloss@suscom.net ignorance and confidence,
and then success is sure.
Mark Twain