[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [seul-edu] ISO Phase 3
- To: <seul-edu@seul.org>
- Subject: RE: [seul-edu] ISO Phase 3
- From: "Darryl Palmer" <Darryl_Palmer_Jr@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 21:41:41 -0600
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: seul-edu-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: seul-edu@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:41:46 -0500
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <20030131085607.439c9ccb.hilaire@ext.cri74.org>
- Reply-to: seul-edu@seul.org
- Sender: owner-seul-edu@seul.org
When exactly can we mark an app as passing Phase 3? Is the idea of
having a Debian .deb package still sufficient in itself to pass Phase 3,
or is more required?
Darryl
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-seul-edu@seul.org [mailto:owner-seul-edu@seul.org] On Behalf
Of Hilaire Fernandes
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 1:56 AM
To: seul-edu@seul.org
Subject: Re: [seul-edu] ISO Phase 3
Doug,
From my -- little -- experience with alien, I know there are problem
with the shared libraries when you convert an .deb package to a .rpm
one. If the .deb package of a binary application is prepared on a Debian
system with a library X with a number Y and you want to install it under
a RedHat distro using library X with number Y' the binary may not be
able to link at run time with the library X, number Y'.
I don"t know if there are any solutions to this issue.
With applicaiton written with interpreted language the problem may be
less sensitive.
Hilaire