[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [seul-edu] Re: Which version of Linux to use?

To: seul-edu@seul.org
Subject: Re: [seul-edu] Re: Which version of Linux to use?
From: Art Petrzelka <art@complum.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 08:27:26 -0600
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: seul-edu-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-To: seul-edu@seul.org
Delivery-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:27:00 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20020214093209.GO1572@lic145.kiev.ua>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0202112204330.12281-100000@pilchuck.reedmedia.net> <20020213220109.CB6ECE5@burroak.complum.com> <20020214093209.GO1572@lic145.kiev.ua>
Reply-To: seul-edu@seul.org
Sender: owner-seul-edu@seul.org

Thanks for clearing up this and all my other errors so others don't repeat 
them.  You just exposed my Mandrake-centric view of Linux.  ;-)

On Thursday 14 February 2002 03:32 am, you wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 04:12:58PM -0600, Art Petrzelka wrote:
> > The 2.2 kernel takes up much less memory than the 2.4 kernel. The 2.4
> > kernel broke a lot of single-floppy Linux setups used for firewalls and
> > routers.
>
> Not exactly true.  Careful configuration of 2.4 *may* give even
> smaller kernel; my current one is 818626 bytes of bzImage and
> takes less than two megs of RAM itself:
>

References:
- Re: [seul-edu] Best wm for tiny slow computers?
  - From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed@reedmedia.net>
- Re: [seul-edu] Which version of Linux to use?
  - From: Art Petrzelka <art@complum.com>
- [seul-edu] Re: Which version of Linux to use?
  - From: Michael Shigorin <mike@lic145.kiev.ua>

Prev by Date: [seul-edu] New Educational Applications
Next by Date: Re: [seul-edu] Re: Which version of Linux to use?
Prev by thread: [seul-edu] Re: Which version of Linux to use?
Next by thread: Re: [seul-edu] Re: Which version of Linux to use?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread