[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SEUL suggestions and Re: Older Equiptment
On Sat, 12 Dec 1998, Michael A Hamblin wrote:
>On Sat, 12 Dec 1998, Roman Suzi wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Michael on your review.
>> However, I have not found the most obvious solutions in it,
>> which I wish I knew more:
>
>These are the kinds of questions I'm trying to answer :)
For example, at home I am using two computers: floppyless
i486DX-100 (with 1.2 Gb HD ;-) with lots of memory 16 Mb and
another one K6-200 with not so much memory: 64Mb.
And my poor mans LAN is made of null-printer cable and PLIP
protocol. Works great!
At work (teachers qualification/retraining Institute) we have a
spare harddiskless PC with 1 MB 32pin simm.
And I want to use it as a terminal, not thru PLIP, but thru
serial connection of some sort to the i386 box (with, you
guess, MiniLinux and spare serial port), which will connect me
to a "superb" server: i486-DX66 with lots of memory and power:
12 Mb.
I explained all this because its a typical case for lots of our
educational institutions: we have ooutdated hardware which
could make good terminals for, say, email access or database
access or whatever else, like text editing.
So, I think its one of the things SEUL (*simple* edu use of
Linux) is for: to give people simple (cheap and efficient)
solutions on how to connect terminals for Linux (yes, its not
purely software issue, but still...)
I hope one day we will see SEUL/EDU as a place, where one can
find any info needed on:
- selected and annotated edu/school admin software pointers and/or copies
- hard/software solutions, typical for schools
- possible Linux configuration recommendations
for different situations.
- pointers to methodological material (paper or online)
on how to teach children on Linux applications
- a forum where teachers could exchange ideas about
integrating Linux into teaching process
>It's not just an argument, it's reality. Do more, with less :) Who do you
>know running an NT server can run a seperate terminal off of it (without
>expensive software) so multiple people can use one machine at the same
>time? And yet we're talking about doing it with completly antiquidated
>equiptment.
>
>I think that's the basic thing I'm getting at here. And I'm sure PCs are a
>little harder to come by in Russia than here in the US... :) All the more
>reason to support this kind of stuff. Although we'll have to figure
>something out for that monitor radiation problem ;)
Well, but then it is easier to find people in Russia which know
how to make old electronics work for new schemes.
There are 2 problems I see (beside technical ones, which are
solvable by Internet data-mining):
1. Monitor radiation from old equipment is such that
have no moral right to make terminals from
what we have (some PDP-like chip based soviet
two-processor (!) educational machines called UKNC)
due to the fact they SUCKS like terminals!
_Physically_ SUCKS!
I don't wish my enemies to sit beside them for that reason.
They were great machines at the end of 80s, but
with so 'unstable' network and monitors...
2. Sometimes teachers think like this:
"Lets talk the director into buying NEW computers,
Pentiums, so we will be able to teach MS Office.
If we make this crap (XT, i286, i386) work, the director will
be less inclined to "probivat'" (ask from his superiors)
new computers."
Sincerely yours,
Roman A. Suzi
-- Petrozavodsk -- Karelia -- Russia --
-- powered by Linux RedHat 5.1 --