Re: [freeqt] Re: FreeQt concerns

[Joel Dillon <emily@cornholio.new.ox.ac.uk>]

> The FSF and a large chunk of the Linux crew doesn't believe the QT 
> License will remain unchanged.  Therefore troll Tech would have no
> reason
> to trust us.  Putting Harmony / FreeQT under the GPL would mean that 
> it's a hard fact.  Is the GPL restrictive enough or should it
> specifically
> state that "These Libs may not be used to none GPLd Software" ?

 I suspect the GPL would be restrictive enough. But I have no wish to
ruin Trolltech; I'm happy with any licence that forces people to
use Qt, not Harmony, for commercial products. As long as KDE gets
accepted as GPL by the whole Linux community I'm happy.

	Jo