Re: PakFiles

[Christian Reiniger <warewolf@mayn.de>]

s369625@student.uq.edu.au wrote:

>>Hmmm, I think variable sized filenames are the best way. They are only read
>Agreed, I was just thinking that it would be simpler not to store a variable
>sized datum like a filename unecassarily.

But good that you said that anyway - it brought me to the pascal-like
string storing which makes reading really easier and faster ;)

>>Apropos "char" - just a weird idea popping up: How useful is Unicode
>>support for Filenames? Perhaps a Feature for Version 2?
>I suppose you should go for it right now, just use wchar_t (thats what it
>is called isn't it?) and pretend it is ascii.

Hmm, then we'll need conversion functions all around - e.g. fopen () uses
normal ASCII strings. Unicode is very nice, but also very difficult to use
in this ASCII-based world :(

Cu
	Christian
--

It's lonely in the saddle since the horse died...