RE: RFOR: Is LGDC really crap?

["Green, Aaron" <JAGREEN@GAPAC.com>]

I have a lot of spare time at my job where I peruse internet  newssites.  I'm also
learning OpenGL and just got a book on Linux 3D programming.  I'd
be glad to help out with content.  But like I said, I agree with the statement that
very few people need to have this priviledge.  Unless you want Slashdot-like
news activity.  I do agree, this site is well-known, and I think with a few changes
could see a lot of improvement in popularity.  The creator has done a lot of great
work in the layout.  

> ----------
> From: 	Steve Baker[SMTP:sjbaker1@airmail.net]
> Reply To: 	linuxgames@sunsite.dk
> Sent: 	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 7:55 PM
> To: 	linuxgames@sunsite.dk
> Subject: 	Re: RFOR: Is LGDC really crap?
> 
> "Green, Aaron" wrote:
> 
> > But, if you really don't care about the site, then this effert would be well spent
> > somewhere else.
> 
> The reason LGDC shouldn't be simply abandoned is that it's reasonably well
> known (especially by it's target audience) and is linked to from all over
> the place.  If someone wanted to start something like that from scratch, it
> would be very difficult to get noticed.
> 
> > I'd personally love to see a good Linux game dev site happen.  I
> > have a site that is just sitting there waiting for good subject matter if needed.
> 
> With the advent of affordable 24/7 DSL and cable connections, sites are easy
> to come by.  It's the content that's the problem.
> 
> ----------------------------- Steve Baker -------------------------------
> Mail : <sjbaker1@airmail.net>   WorkMail: <sjbaker@link.com>
> URLs : http://www.sjbaker.org
>        http://plib.sf.net http://tuxaqfh.sf.net http://tuxkart.sf.net
>        http://prettypoly.sf.net http://freeglut.sf.net
>        http://toobular.sf.net   http://lodestone.sf.net
>