Re: Summary uploaded

[Bryan Patrick Coleman <bpcolema@uncg.edu>]

> A kernel patch certainly IS required to use KGI.
> Fortunately, KGI IS NOT required to use libggi.
> Since KGI is still developmental, perhaps it's 
> worthwhile to not even mention it except for the 
> purpose of clarification (and it would be transparent
> to the programmer regardless).

Mabey my understanding on this one is unclear but it seems to me like the
KGI can use or mabey that is KGIcon calls can use FBcon in wich case it
would only have to use KGIcon nativly instead of FBcon. I could be totaly
wrong as I am not even sure what I just said but it sounded good. 

-  Bryan Patrick Coleman  -  Triad Linux Users Group  -  bpcolema@uncg.edu  -
     -  http://www.wayward.net/tlug/index.html  -  tlug-mail@uncg.edu  -