[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

SIMD

To: <linuxgames@sunsite.dk>
Subject: SIMD
From: "Vesselin Peev" <vesselinpeev@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 17:52:42 +0100
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: mailing list linuxgames@sunsite.dk
Delivery-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 10:44:36 -0500
Mailing-List: contact linuxgames-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
References: <200202270418.XAA17538@identicalsoftware.com> <OE65Ln5U9T3TGJ2TUSz000198c3@hotmail.com> <E16g5UE-0005QL-00@sand2.global.net.uk>
Reply-To: linuxgames@sunsite.dk


> AFAIK, GCC doesn't auto-vectorize (yet - I met the guy who was being paid
by
> SuSE to do it), and the Linux version of VectorC isn't out yet, so you'll
> need to do it manually, or nab the source from the Codeplay website
> (http://www.codeplay.com) for the demo (or use the benchmark snippets) as
a
> reference.

I've just come across libSIMD. It said to use SIMD whenever possible on
every platform GCC compiles. How about that?

References:
- Re: OpenGL vs. SDL for 2D
  - From: Dennis Payne <dulsi@identicalsoftware.com>
- Re: OpenGL vs. SDL for 2D
  - From: "Vesselin Peev" <vesselinpeev@hotmail.com>
- Re: OpenGL vs. SDL for 2D
  - From: Mark Collins <me@thisisnurgle.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: OpenGL vs. SDL for 2D
Next by Date: Re: OpenGL vs. SDL for 2D
Prev by thread: Re: OpenGL vs. SDL for 2D
Next by thread: Re: OpenGL vs. SDL for 2D
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread