[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Performance issues

To: linuxgames@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: Performance issues
From: Dennis Payne <dulsi@identicalsoftware.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 20:43:30 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: mailing list linuxgames@sunsite.dk
Delivery-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 20:43:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <3ACE3CDE.D957CD48@gbl.com.br> from "Achilles" at Apr 06, 2001 07:02:06 PM
Mailing-List: contact linuxgames-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Reply-To: linuxgames@sunsite.dk

> 	If we discard any kind of hardware acceleration, videowise anyways,
> what performs better? 16bpp or 32bpp ?!? And why?

I'd imagine 16bpp would be faster due to the smaller amount of data
to send for updates.  Why do you want to know which one performs
better without acceleration.

Dennis Payne
dulsi@identicalsoftware.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: linuxgames-unsubscribe@sunsite.dk
For additional commands, e-mail: linuxgames-help@sunsite.dk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Performance issues
  - From: Steve Baker <sjbaker1@airmail.net>

References:
- Performance issues
  - From: Achilles <maos@gbl.com.br>

Prev by Date: Re: OpenGL Transparency
Next by Date: Re: OpenGL Transparency
Prev by thread: Performance issues
Next by thread: Re: Performance issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread