[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Replacement for SSI



On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Donovan Rebbechi wrote:

> 
> On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, David Webster wrote:
> 
> > I toyed with the idea of using SSI for the header and footer, but decided
> > against it. Instead I wrote a bash script that automatically adds the
> > header and footer to my page.
> 
> This is how I used to maintain the site and I got no end of complaints. It
> makes things more difficult because you need to explain to all the
> maintainers how your script(s) work. At the end of the day, the main
> maintainer will be the only one who understands how the site works ( which
> is potentially a very bad thing )

Fair point. I 'spose it is a good idea when there is one maintainer for
the site, but as more get involved, everyone has to know how things work
(which means communication).
 
> Right now, we're using SSI, it works, and I don't see a good reason to
> remove it.

Fair enough.
 
David
--		   ,------------------------------,
,==================| S H U N  A N T I O N L I N E |=================,
| David M. Webster '------------------------------' (aka cogNiTioN) |
|===| I use Linux everyday to up my productivity - so up yours! |===|
|=================|-| PGP KeyID: 0x 45 FA C2 83 |-|=================|
| <cognition@bigfoot.com> |-|===========|-| http://www.cognite.net/ |
`===========| I walk to the beat of a different drummer |==========='