RE: (FC-Devel) Project direction (was lots of threads)

["Lavergne, Dean" <dean.lavergne@csfb.com>]

I don't see why not.  Shall we give it a go?

Dean


> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Zeits, Matthew A [SMTP:matthew.a.zeits@lmco.com]
> Sent:	Monday, February 14, 2000 10:27 AM
> To:	'freecase-devel@seul.org'
> Subject:	RE: (FC-Devel) Project direction (was lots of threads)
> 
>  
> Actually, could we get wrappers around other things,
> like DIA?  we could then focus on the interface issues
> and integration, and not on problems like graph tool design,
> etc?
> 
> Matt Zeits
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lavergne, Dean
> To: 'freecase-devel@seul.org'
> Sent: 2/14/00 10:16 AM
> Subject: RE: (FC-Devel) Project direction (was lots of threads)
> 
> 
> Does it make sense to place a CORBA layer over CVS for the initial pass?
> This way we get versioning while still coding to the interface so that
> we
> could switch CVS to something else if it makes sense.
> 
> Ideas?
> 
> 
> Dean
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Roger Dingledine [SMTP:arma@mit.edu]
> > Sent:	Thursday, February 10, 2000 3:48 AM
> > To:	freecase-devel@seul.org
> > Subject:	(FC-Devel) Project direction (was lots of threads)
> > 
> > ----- Forwarded message from owner-freecase-devel@seul.org -----
> > 
> > From: "J. Shan Bell" <bellj@mikado.soho.enteract.com>
> > Date: Wed,  9 Feb 2000 23:17:17 -0600
> > To: freecase-devel@seul.org
> > Subject: Project direction (was lots of threads)
> > Reply-To: bellj@sbecorp.com
> > 
> >  I agree with Jeff Duska that scope creep is probably an issue here.
> > But I don't agree that we should turn our attention to Argo or Dia and
> > improve them. FreeCase is in the position to address needs that aren't
> > being addressed elsewhere. In my mind robust support for collaborative
> > design and real support for patterns come to mind.
> > 
> > 
> > Perhaps having a distributed architecture is not the best idea for a
> > first pass. I agree with Arjan that a strong foundation should be
> > laid. I see this as being important for the overall design. But if we
> > implemented a common repository based on CVS (or the like) versus
> > CORBA, are we really shooting ourselves in the foot?
> > 
> > 
> > Shan
> > 
> > ----- End forwarded message -----
> 
> This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain 
> confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No 
> confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
> If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and
> all
> copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify
> the
> sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
> distribute, 
> print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended 
> recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
> the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.
> Any
> views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
> except
> where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
> 
> them to be the views of any such entity.
> 

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain 
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No 
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, 
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended 
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state 
them to be the views of any such entity.